DAMPAK STANDAR KEBERLANJUTAN TERHADAP PENDAPATAN USAHA TANI KOPI: KASUS PROGRAM CAFE PRACTICES DI KABUPATEN ENREKANG
Keywords:
CAFE practices, coffee, kopi, propensity score matching, standar keberlanjutan, sustainability standardsAbstract
English
The Coffee and Farmer Equity (CAFE) Practices is a sustainable coffee farming and handling program initiated by Starbucks Coffee Company. The CAFE Practices program offers economic benefits through increased coffee productivity and quality, better market access, and higher coffee prices. The program, however, potentially increases the production costs needed to implement better cultivation practices according to the CAFE Practices protocol. This study aims to analyze the impact of CAFE Practices program on coffee farming income in Enrekang Regency, and to track down the income impact pathways. This study used primary data from 200 coffee farmers in Enrekang Regency. The data were analyzed using the Propensity Score Matching method. The results showed that the CAFE Practices participating farmers had 18.55% higher farm income than non-CAFE Practices farmers. The change in the CAFE Practices participating farmers was due to increasing farm productivity by 16.66%, increasing production costs by 24.38%, and increasing selling prices by 2.95%. CAFE Practices farmers should be able to maintain or increase their coffee productivity and quality in order to continue to receive high incomes. They also need financial support from the government and/or Starbucks to meet the higher cost of implementing the CAFE Practices program.
Indonesian
Coffee and Farmer Equity (CAFE) Practices adalah program standar budi daya dan penanganan kopi berkelanjutan yang diinisiasi oleh Starbucks Coffee Company. Di satu sisi, penerapan Program CAFE Practices menawarkan keuntungan ekonomi melalui peningkatan produktivitas dan kualitas kopi, akses pasar yang lebih baik, dan harga kopi yang lebih tinggi. Di sisi lain, penerapan program juga berpotensi meningkatkan biaya produksi yang dibutuhkan untuk menerapkan praktik budi daya yang lebih baik sesuai protokol CAFE Practices. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dampak Program CAFE Practices terhadap pendapatan usaha tani kopi di Kabupaten Enrekang, serta menganalisis perubahan komponen pendapatan yang merupakan jalur dampak perubahan pendapatan tersebut. Penelitian menggunakan data primer dari 200 petani kopi di Kabupaten Enrekang yang dikumpulkan pada bulan Juli–Agustus 2021. Data dianalisis dengan metode Propensity Score Matching. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa petani kopi yang berpartisipasi dalam Program CAFE Practices memperoleh pendapatan usaha tani 18,55% lebih tinggi dibandingkan petani yang tidak berpartisipasi. Perubahan pendapatan disebabkan oleh peningkatan produktivitas kopi sebesar 16,66%, peningkatan biaya produksi sebesar 24,38%, dan peningkatan harga jual kopi sebesar 2,95%. Petani yang berpartisipasi dalam Program CAFE Practices harus dapat mempertahankan atau meningkatkan produktivitas dan kualitas kopi yang dihasilkan agar tetap dapat menerima pendapatan yang tinggi. Petani kopi juga membutuhkan dukungan pembiayaan dari pemerintah dan/atau Starbucks agar dapat memenuhi kebutuhan biaya yang tinggi atas penerapan Program CAFE Practices.
Downloads
References
A’yunin NQ, Achdiyat A, Saridewi TR. 2020. Preferensi anggota kelompok tani terhadap penerapan prinsip enam tepat (6T) dalam aplikasi pestisida. J Inov Penelit. 1(3): 253–264. doi:10.47492/jip.v1i3.73.
Asdar A. 2015. Peran pemerintah daerah dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat petani kopi di Desa Pebaloran, Kecamatan Curio, Kabupaten Enrekang [Skripsi]. [Makassar (ID)]: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
Assamha FH. 2017. Dampak perubahan iklim terhadap produktivitas tanaman kopi di Kabupaten Tana Toraja [Tesis]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Bacon CM, Méndez VE, Gómez MEF, Stuart D, Flores SRD. 2008. Are sustainable coffee certifications enough to secure farmer livelihoods? The millenium development goals and Nicaragua’s fair trade cooperatives. globalizations. 5(2): 259–274. doi:10.1080/14747730802057688.
Bai H. 2005. Methodological considerations in implementing propensity score matching. In: prospensity score analysis: fundamentals and developments. W.Pand & H. New York (US): Guilford Press. p.74–88; [diunduh 2021 Jun 12]. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-32892-004
Bekere YB, Megersa GR. 2021. Coffee certification participation and its impact on smallholder farmers’ income in Jimma Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Agrosoc Econ J. 21(02): 87–102. doi:10.21776/ub.agrise.2021.021.2.2.
Blackman A, Rivera J. 2011. Producer-level benefits of sustainability certification. Conservation Biology. 25(6): 1176–1185. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011. 01774.x.
Blackmore E, Keeley J, Pyburn R, Mangus E, Chen L, Yuhui Q. 2012. Pro-poor certification: assessing the benefits of sustainability certification for small-scale farmers in Asia. Natural Resources. London (UK): International Institute for Enviromental and Development; [cited 2020 Feb 23]. Available from: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/14604IIED.pdf?
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2020a. Statistik kopi Indonesia 2019. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2020b. Kabupaten Enrekang dalam angka 2020. Enrekang (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Enrekang.
Bray JG, Neilson J. 2017. Reviewing the impacts of coffee certification programmes on smallholder livelihoods. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Services and Manag. 13(1): 216–232. doi:10.1080/21513732.2017.1316520.
Castillejos T, Baer E, Semroc B. 2017. Colombia field survey report. Narino (CO): Conservation International.
[CCTC] Coffee and Cocoa Trade Center. 2018. Beberapa standard pemeringkatan mutu biji kopi [Internet]. [diunduh 2021 Okt 11]. Tersedia dari: https://www.cctcid.com/2018/08/29/beberapa-standard-pemeringkatan-mutu-biji-kopi-2/.
Chagwiza C, Muradian R, Ruben R. 2016. Cooperative membership and dairy performance among smallholders in Ethiopia. Food Policy. 59: 165–173. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.01.008.
Chiputwa B, Spielman DJ, Qaim M. 2015. Food standards, certification, and poverty among coffee farmers in Uganda. World Development. 66:400–412. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.006.
Dietz T, Chong AE, Grabs J, Kilian B, Dietz T, Chong AE, Grabs J, Kilian B, Kilian B. 2019. How effective is multiple certification in improving the economic conditions of smallholder farmers ? evidence from an impact evaluation in Colombia ’ s coffee belt. J Develop Stud. 56(6):1141–1160. doi:10.1080/00220388.2019.1632433.
[Ditjenbun] Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan Indonesia. 2019. Tree crop estate statistic of Indonesia 2018-2020. Jakarta (ID): Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan Indonesia.
[DJKI] Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. 2021. E-indikasi geografis [Internet]. [diunduh 2021 Okt 11]. Tersedia dari: https://ig.dgip.go.id/detail-ig/18.
Donaldson GF, McInerney JP. 1973. Changing machinery technology and agricultural adjustment. Am J Agric Econ.. 55(5): 829–839.
Fikriyah. 2012. Dinamika kopi Sulawesi di pasar global dan pengaruhnya terhadap rantai kopi lokal di Sulawesi Selatan [Skripsi]. [Depok (UI)]: Universitas Indonesia.
Giovanucci D, Potts J. 2008. Seeking sustainability: cosa preliminary analysis of sustainability initiatives in the coffee sector. Winnipeg (CA): Committee on Sustainability Assesment.
Gokavi N, Mote K, Jayakumar M, Raghuramulu Y, Surendran U. 2021. The effect of modified pruning and planting systems on growth, yield , labour use efficiency and economics of arabica coffee. Scientia Horticulturae. 276: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109764.
Grunert KG, Hieke S, Wills J. 2014. Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy. 44:177–189. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001.
Haggar J, Jerez R, Cuadra L, Alvarado U, Soto G. 2012. Environmental and economic costs and benefits from sustainable certification of coffee in Nicaragua. Food Chain. 2(1): 24–41. doi:10.3362/2046-1887.2012.004.
Haile M, Kang WH. 2016. The harvest and post-harvest management practices’ impact on coffee quality. intech open. Coffee-Production and Research: 1–18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89224.
Hicks JR. 1963. The theory of wages. 2 ed. Toronto: Macmillan and Company Limited.
Hu Y, Li B, Zhang Z, Wang J. 2019. Farm size and agricultural technology progress: evidence from China. J Rural Stud. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019. 01.009.
[IFCC] Independent Fine Coffee Consultant. 2005. Setting up of a fine coffees certification programme. Nairobi (KE): Independent Fine Coffee Consultant.
Jena PR, Chichaibelu BB, Stellmacher T, Grote U. 2012. The impact of coffee certification on small-scale producers’ livelihoods: a case study from the Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Agric Econ. 43(4): 429–440. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00594.x.
Kaczorowska J, Rejman K, Halicka E, Szczebylo A, Górska-Warsewicz H. 2019. Impact of food sustainability labels on the perceived product value and price expectations of urban consumers. Sustainability. 11(24):1-17. doi:10.3390/SU11247240.
Kilian B, Pratt L, Jones C, Villalobos A. 2004. Can the private sector be competitive and contribute to development through sustainable agricultural business? a case study of coffee in Latin America. Int Food and Agribusi Manag Rev. 7(3):21–45. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.8149.
Lee HL, Lee C-Y. 2007. Building a sustainable supply chain, starbucks coffee and farmer equity program. In: Building supply chain excellence in emerging economies. Springer Science & Business Media, LCC. p.391–405.
Li Hui, Huang D, Ma Q, Qi W, Li Hua. 2020. Factors influencing the technology adoption behaviours of litchi farmers in China. Sustainability. 12(1): 1–13. doi:10.3390/su12010271.
Loconto A, Dankers C. 2014. Impact of international voluntary standards on smallholder market participation in developing countries - a review of the literatur. Rome(IT): Food and Agricultural Organization.
Manning S, Boons F, von Hagen O, Reinecke J. 2012. National contexts matter: the co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecol Econ. 83: 197–209. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011. 08.029.
Matuschke I, Qaim M. 2008. Seed Market privatisation and farmers’ access to crop technologies: the case of hybrid pearl millet adoption in India. J Agric Econ. 59(3): 498–515. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552. 2008.00159.x.
Mergenthaler M, Weinberger K, Qaim M. 2009. The food system transformation in developing countries: a disaggregate demand analysis for fruits and vegetables in Vietnam. Food Policy. 34: 426–436. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.03.009.
Mitiku F, Mey Y de, Nyssen J, Maertens M. 2017. Do private sustainability standards contribute to income growth and poverty alleviation? a comparison of different coffee certification schemes in Ethiopia. Sustainability. 9(2): 1–21. doi:10.3390/su9020246.
[MPKE] Masyarakat Perlindungan Kopi Enrekang. 2012. Buku persyaratan indikasi geografis. Enrekang (ID): Masyarakat Perlindungan Kopi Enrekang.
Muradian R, Pelupessy W. 2005. Governing the coffee chain: the role of voluntary regulatory systems. World Development. 33(12): 2029–2044. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.06.007.
Neilson J. 2008. Global private regulation and value-chain restructuring in Indonesian Smallholder Coffee Systems. World Develop. 36(9): 1607–1622. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.005.
Novita E, Syarief R, Noor E, Mulato DS. 2010. Peningkatan mutu biji kopi rakyat dengan pengolah semi basah berbasis produksi bersih. J Agrotek. 4(1): 76–90.
Nurmalina R. 2017. Indikator operasional pembangunan pertanian berkelanjutan di negara berkembang. In: Krisnamurthi B, Harianto, editors. Agribusiness series 2017 : menuju agribisnis Indonesia yang berdaya saing. Bogor (ID): Departemen Agribisnis, FEM-IPB. hlm. 251–266.
Omoregbee F, Okoedo-Okojie D. 2008. Farmers’ characteristics and adoption of recommended practices under the Fadama project scheme in Edo State, Nigeria. Global J Agric Sci. 7(1):51–56. doi:10.4314/gjass.v7i1.2358.
Oya C, Schaefer F, Skalidou D. 2018. The effectiveness of agricultural certification in developing countries: a systematic review. World Development. 112:282–312. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.001.
Panhuysen S, Pierrot J. 2018. Coffee Barometer 2018. The Netherlands: conservational international, COSA, Hivos, Oxfarm Wereldwinkels and Solidaridad
Potts J. 2007. Alternative trade initiatives and income predictability: theory and evidence from the coffee sector. International Institute Sustainable Development [Internet]. [cited 2020 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/trade_ price_alt_trade.pdf.
Reta R, Dahlia D, Larekeng H, Mustaka ZD. 2019. Kopi arabika kalosi produk unggulan Kabupaten Enrekang. In: UNRI conference series: community engagement. 1:564–568.
Reta R, Salengke S, Muhidong J, Mustafa A, Mursalim M, Syasmsia S, Sumule O, Zaimar Z. 2020. Fermentation of arabica coffee beans using ohmic heating technology in producing specialty coffee. Pelita Perkebunan. 36(3):226–235. doi:10.22302/iccri.jur.pelitaperkebunan.v36i3.452.
Ridwan I, Ala A, Irfansyah T, Rafiuddin, Farid Bdr M, Haring F. 2020. Good Agriculture Practice (GAP) of arabica coffee: implementation on the smallholder estate in Enrekang Regency. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 575. IOP Publishing.
van Rijsbergen B, Elbers W, Ruben R, Njuguna SN. 2016. The ambivalent impact of coffee certification on farmers’ welfare: a matched panel approach for cooperatives in Central Kenya. World Development. 77:277–292. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.021.
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 70(1):41–45. doi:10.1017/CBO 9780511810725.016.
Ruben R, Zuniga G. 2011. How standards compete: comparative impact of coffee certification schemes in Northern Nicaragua. Supply Chain Manag. 16(2): 98–109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1359 8541111115356.
Rubin DB. 2001. Using Propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Servic Outcomes Res Method. 2: 169–188. doi:10.1017/CBO9780 511810725.030.
Rubiyo, Martono B, Dani. 2011. Perakitan teknologi untuk peningkatan produksi dan mutu hasil perkebunan kopi rakyat. Dalam: Penguatan inovasi teknologi mendukung kemandirian usahatani perkebunan kopi rakyat. Sukabumi (ID): Balai Penelitian Tanaman Industri dan Penyegar.
[SCAA] Specialty Coffee Asociation of America. 2009. Green coffee quality version 21VOV2009A. California (US): Specialty Coffee Asociation of America.
[SCS] Sustainable Certification System. 2016. C.A.F.E practices smallholder scorecard [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.scsglobalservices.com/files/program_documents/cafe_scr_smallholderv3.4_011516.pdf.
[SCS] Sustainable Certification System. 2017. C.A.F.E. practices verifier and inspector operations manual (V5.3) [Internet]. [diunduh 2021 Jan 8]. Available from: https://cdn.scsglobalservices.com/files/program_documents/cafe_man_verinsops_v5_3_102817.pdf.
Sinaga SV, Harianto H, Suharno S. 2019. The analysis of propensity score matching on the economic effect of C.A.F.E. practices certification toward lintong coffee farming in North Sumatera. J Agrisep: Kajian Masalah Sos Ekon Pertan Agribi s. 18(1): 139–152. doi:10.31186/jagrisep.18.1.139-152.
Ssebunya BR, Schader C, Baumgart L, Landert J, Altenbuchner C, Schmid E, Stolze M. 2019. Sustainability Performance of certified and non-certified smallholder coffee farms in Uganda. Ecol Econ. 156: 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.004.
Starbucks. 2020. C.A.F.E. Practices: starbucks approach to ethically sourcing coffee - starbucks stories. Starbucks Stories News [Internet]. [diunduh 2021 Jan 8]. Tersedia dari: https://stories.starbucks.com/press/2020/cafe-practices-starbucks-approach-to-ethically-sourcing-coffee/.
Stuart EA. 2010. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Statistic Sci. 25(1): 1–21. doi:10.1214/09-STS313.
Suprehatin. 2021. Determinant of agricultural technology adoption by smallholder farmers in developing countries: perspective and prospect for Indonesia. J Penelit Pengemb Pertan. 40(1): 21–30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v40n1.2021.p21-30.
Vellema W, Buritica Casanova A, Gonzalez C, D’Haese M. 2015. The effect of specialty coffee certification on household livelihood strategies and specialisation. Food Policy. 57: 13–25. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.003.
Wahyudi A, Wulandari S, Aunillah A, Alouw JC. 2020. Sustainability certification as a pillar to promote indonesian coffee competitiveness. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 418. IOP Publishing.
Wahyuno D, Manohara D, Pribadi ER, Octivia T, Trisawa IM, Sudarsono, Hernani. 2017. Permasalahan, peluang dan tantangan pengembangan kopi di Indonesia. Warta Penelit dan Pengembang Tanam Industri. 23(3): 4–7. ISSN 0853-8204.
van der Werff SRM. 2013. Sustainability standards in the coffee chain [Disertasi]. [Wageningan (NL)]: Wageningen University.
Wyss R, Fromm I, Garcia M. 2012. Socio-environmental certifications : risks and opportunities for small-scale coffee farmers in Central America. Int J Develop Societi. 1(4): 133–140. doi:10.11634/216817831201162.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Agro Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
psekp.setjen.pertanian.go.id 
psekp kemtan
psekp_kemtan 
@psekp_kementan 
PSEKP Kementan